Puzzle #100 – Ten by Ten

Lots of discussion in the comments last week. Thanks for all of your thoughts. Here are some of my own thoughts, in all of their unsolicited glory.

First, some puzzles are harder than others. I don’t think that means that you shouldn’t a puzzle just because you’re told that it’s a hard puzzle. I do think that means you should change your expectations/rules accordingly. Don’t expect to solve a puzzle as quickly as you’re used to, whether you tear through “easy” puzzles in 5 minutes or 55 minutes. Further, when I started solving puzzles, I often solved with a partner. When using the computer, I’d leave what I call the “cheats” (where the software tells you when you’ve put in a wrong letter) on. I allowed myself the use of the Internet when I got stuck. I don’t think, for someone starting out or just used to puzzles from other sources, that any of those should be discouraged. It should also be noted: just because I think a puzzle’s challenging, that doesn’t mean you’ll think it’s challenging.

Second, yes, I do like putting bits and pieces of popular culture in puzzles. (And there are other fields I draw heavily from, too. Math and mythology spring to mind.) Allow me to cite the spec sheet for the Los Angeles Times crossword:

Using names of people and places enhances a puzzle, especially when the names are drawn from all over: TV, movies, literature, music, science, etc. A variety of names scattered about the grid can challenge solvers and help expand their knowledge base. Too many names in a puzzle, in our opinion, turn it into a trivia contest. Please avoid overuse of people’s names, or any other material that falls in the either-you-know-it-or-you-don’t category. If you have no choice but to use a difficult name or place, make sure it doesn’t cross something equally difficult in the grid.

I greatly respect Rich Norris, the editor of the LAT puzzle, and try to follow most of this in writing puzzles for this site. I will say that I have a much higher tolerance for an overall name-count, because I enjoy a good trivia contest. But I do try to take names that I feel that today’s solvers would be likely to know (i.e., I omit opera singers of the 1910s and the like), and I really try to keep the crossings fair. That said, I’m not perfect. I know of one particular crossing in last week’s puzzle that I was not pleased with at all, but I could not fix it. Sometimes things happen.

Finally, one reason I started this site was to be able to do really weird things that you wouldn’t see in a newspaper puzzle. I like being able to occasionally surprise solvers, and I always intend for it to be a pleasant surprise. I hope that you enjoyed last week’s twist, and I hope you enjoy twists to come, including today’s (much more upfront) offering.

Reminder: Lollapuzzoola 7 is this weekend in Manhattan. Go to there. (Or solve at home!)

This entry was posted in Challenging. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Puzzle #100 – Ten by Ten

  1. e.a. says:

    congrats on 100, man. a fun solve and a good read.

  2. Norm says:

    Interesting/challenging. I kept forgetting to question my assumptions.

  3. Rob says:

    I liked this one! As someone who has to use cheats occasionally, I needed far fewer than I expected when I first opened the puzzle. Congrats on 100!

  4. Thomamos says:

    Fun puzzle!

  5. Jeff G. says:

    100 excellent puzzles, and I’ve enjoyed them all (and the Puzzlefest too). Getting 1a was really the key for me on this one. Lots of fun!

  6. Pingback: MGWCC #326 — Friday, August 29th, 2014 — “I Beg Your Part Ten!” | Matt Gaffney's Weekly Crossword Contest

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s